|[ << ]||[ >> ]||[Top]||[Contents]||[Index]||[ ? ]|
Welcome to Pintos. Pintos is a simple operating system framework for the 80x86 architecture. It supports kernel threads, loading and running user programs, and a file system, but it implements all of these in a very simple way. In the Pintos projects, you and your project team will strengthen its support in all three of these areas. You will also add a virtual memory implementation.
Pintos could, theoretically, run on a regular IBM-compatible PC. Unfortunately, it is impractical to supply every CS 3204 student a dedicated PC for use with Pintos. Therefore, we will run Pintos projects in a system simulator, that is, a program that simulates an 80x86 CPU and its peripheral devices accurately enough that unmodified operating systems and software can run under it. In class we will use the Bochs and QEMU simulators. Pintos has also been tested with VMware Player.
These projects are hard. CS 3204 has a reputation of taking a lot of time, and deservedly so. We will do what we can to reduce the workload, such as providing a lot of support material, but there is plenty of hard work that needs to be done. We welcome your feedback. If you have suggestions on how we can reduce the unnecessary overhead of assignments, cutting them down to the important underlying issues, please let us know.
This chapter explains how to get started working with Pintos. You should read the entire chapter before you start work on any of the projects.
To get started, you'll have to log into a machine that Pintos can be built on. The CS 3204 "officially supported" Pintos development machines are the remote Linux cluster. You can log on to those machines remotely using
ssh -Y firstname.lastname@example.org
Once you've logged into one of these machines, either locally or
remotely, start out by adding our binaries directory to your
csh you can do so with this command:
set path = ( ~cs3204/bin $path )
.cshrcfile in your home directory. Otherwise, you'll have to type it every time you log in.
bashshell users would instead add
Now you can extract the source for Pintos into a directory named
pintos/src, by executing
zcat /home/courses/cs3204/pintos/pintos.tar.gz | tar x
Let's take a look at what's inside. Here's the directory structure
that you should see in
#include <...>notation. You should have little need to modify this code.
As the next step, build the source code supplied for
the first project. First,
cd into the
directory. Then, issue the
make command. This will create a
build directory under
threads, populate it with a
Makefile and a few subdirectories, and then build the kernel
inside. The entire build should take less than 30 seconds.
Following the build, the following are the interesting files in the
pintos/src/Makefile.build. It describes how to build the kernel. See Adding Source Files, for more information.
backtrace(see section E.4 Backtraces) on it.
kernel.bin. This file is used as a "virtual disk" by the simulator.
build contain object files (
dependency files (
.d), both produced by the compiler. The
dependency files tell
make which source files need to be
recompiled when other source or header files are changed.
We've supplied a program for conveniently running Pintos in a simulator,
pintos. In the simplest case, you can invoke
pintos argument.... Each
argument is passed to the Pintos kernel for it to act on.
Try it out. First
cd into the newly created
directory. Then issue the command
pintos run alarm-multiple,
which passes the arguments
run alarm-multiple to the Pintos
kernel. In these arguments,
run instructs the kernel to run a
alarm-multiple is the test to run.
This command creates a
bochsrc.txt file, which is needed for
running Bochs, and then invoke Bochs. Bochs opens a new window that
represents the simulated machine's display, and a BIOS message briefly
flashes. Then Pintos boots and runs the
program, which outputs a few screenfuls of text. When it's done, you
can close Bochs by clicking on the "Power" button in the window's top
right corner, or rerun the whole process by clicking on the "Reset"
button just to its left. The other buttons are not very useful for our
(If no window appeared at all, and you just got a terminal full of
corrupt-looking text, then you're probably logged in remotely and X
forwarding is not set up correctly. In this case, you can fix your X
setup, or you can use the
-v option to disable X output:
pintos -v -- run alarm-multiple.)
The text printed by Pintos inside Bochs probably went by too quickly to
read. However, you've probably noticed by now that the same text was
displayed in the terminal you used to run
pintos. This is
because Pintos sends all output both to the VGA display and to the first
serial port, and by default the serial port is connected to Bochs's
stdout. You can log serial output to a file by
redirecting at the
command line, e.g.
pintos run alarm-multiple > logfile.
pintos program offers several options for configuring the
simulator or the virtual hardware. If you specify any options, they
must precede the commands passed to the Pintos kernel and be separated
from them by
--, so that the whole command looks like
pintos option... -- argument.... Invoke
pintos without any arguments to see a list of available options.
Options can select a simulator to use: the default is Bochs, but
--qemu selects QEMU. You can run the simulator
with a debugger (see section E.5 GDB). You can set the amount of memory to give
the VM. Finally, you can select how you want VM output to be displayed:
-v to turn off the VGA display,
-t to use your
terminal window as the VGA display instead of opening a new window
(Bochs only), or
-s to suppress serial input from
and output to
The Pintos kernel has commands and options other than
These are not very interesting for now, but you can see a list of them
When you're debugging code, it's useful to be able to run a
program twice and have it do exactly the same thing. On second and
later runs, you can make new observations without having to discard or
verify your old observations. This property is called
"reproducibility." One of the simulators that Pintos supports, Bochs,
can be set up for
reproducibility, and that's the way that
pintos invokes it
Of course, a simulation can only be reproducible from one run to the next if its input is the same each time. For simulating an entire computer, as we do, this means that every part of the computer must be the same. For example, you must use the same command-line argument, the same disks, the same version of Bochs, and you must not hit any keys on the keyboard (because you could not be sure to hit them at exactly the same point each time) during the runs.
While reproducibility is useful for debugging, it is a problem for testing thread synchronization, an important part of most of the projects. In particular, when Bochs is set up for reproducibility, timer interrupts will come at perfectly reproducible points, and therefore so will thread switches. That means that running the same test several times doesn't give you any greater confidence in your code's correctness than does running it only once.
So, to make your code easier to test, we've added a feature, called
"jitter," to Bochs, that makes timer interrupts come at random
intervals, but in a perfectly predictable way. In particular, if you
pintos with the option
-j seed, timer
interrupts will come at irregularly spaced intervals. Within a single
seed value, execution will still be reproducible, but timer
behavior will change as seed is varied. Thus, for the highest
degree of confidence you should test your code with many seed values.
On the other hand, when Bochs runs in reproducible mode, timings are not
realistic, meaning that a "one-second" delay may be much shorter or
even much longer than one second. You can invoke
a different option,
-r, to set up Bochs for realistic
timings, in which a one-second delay should take approximately one
second of real time. Simulation in real-time mode is not reproducible,
-r are mutually exclusive.
The QEMU simulator is available as an
alternative to Bochs (use
--qemu when invoking
pintos). The QEMU simulator is much faster than Bochs, but it
only supports real-time simulation and does not have a reproducible
We will grade your assignments based on test results and design quality, each of which comprises 50% of your grade.
Your test result grade will be based on our tests. Each project has
several tests, each of which has a name beginning with
To completely test your submission, invoke
make check from the
build directory. This will build and run each test and
print a "pass" or "fail" message for each one. When a test fails,
make check also prints some details of the reason for failure.
After running all the tests,
make check also prints a summary
of the test results.
For project 1, the tests will probably run faster in Bochs. For the
rest of the projects, they will run much faster in QEMU.
make check will select the faster simulator by default, but
you can override its choice by specifying
SIMULATOR=--qemu on the
make command line.
You can also run individual tests one at a time. A given test t
writes its output to
t.output, then a script scores the
output as "pass" or "fail" and writes the verdict to
t.result. To run and grade a single test,
.result file explicitly from the
build directory, e.g.
make tests/threads/alarm-multiple.result. If
that the test result is up-to-date, but you want to re-run it anyway,
make clean or delete the
.output file by hand.
By default, each test provides feedback only at completion, not during
its run. If you prefer, you can observe the progress of each test by
VERBOSE=1 on the
make command line, as in
make check VERBOSE=1. You can also provide arbitrary options to the
pintos run by the tests with
make check PINTOSOPTS='-j 1' to select a jitter value of 1
(see section 1.1.4 Debugging versus Testing).
All of the tests and related files are in
Before we test your submission, we will replace the contents of that
directory by a pristine, unmodified copy, to ensure that the correct
tests are used. Thus, you can modify some of the tests if that helps in
debugging, but we will run the originals.
All software has bugs, so some of our tests may be flawed. If you think a test failure is a bug in the test, not a bug in your code, please point it out. We will look at it and fix it if necessary.
Please don't try to take advantage of our generosity in giving out our test suite. Your code has to work properly in the general case, not just for the test cases we supply. For example, it would be unacceptable to explicitly base the kernel's behavior on the name of the running test case. Such attempts to side-step the test cases will receive no credit. If you think your solution may be in a gray area here, please ask us about it.
We will judge your design based on the design document and the source code that you submit. We will read your entire design document and much of your source code.
Don't forget that design quality, including the design document, is 50% of your project grade. It is better to spend one or two hours writing a good design document than it is to spend that time getting the last 5% of the points for tests and then trying to rush through writing the design document in the last 15 minutes.
We provide a design document template for each project. For each significant part of a project, the template asks questions in four areas:
The instructions for this section are always the same:
Copy here the declaration of each new or changed
structmember, global or static variable,
typedef, or enumeration. Identify the purpose of each in 25 words or less.
The first part is mechanical. Just copy new or modified declarations into the design document, to highlight for us the actual changes to data structures. Each declaration should include the comment that should accompany it in the source code (see below).
We also ask for a very brief description of the purpose of each new or changed data structure. The limit of 25 words or less is a guideline intended to save your time and avoid duplication with later areas.
This is where you tell us how your code works, through questions that probe your understanding of your code. We might not be able to easily figure it out from the code, because many creative solutions exist for most OS problems. Help us out a little.
Your answers should be at a level below the high level description of requirements given in the assignment. We have read the assignment too, so it is unnecessary to repeat or rephrase what is stated there. On the other hand, your answers should be at a level above the low level of the code itself. Don't give a line-by-line run-down of what your code does. Instead, use your answers to explain how your code works to implement the requirements.
An operating system kernel is a complex, multithreaded program, in which synchronizing multiple threads can be difficult. This section asks about how you chose to synchronize this particular type of activity.
Whereas the other sections primarily ask "what" and "how," the rationale section concentrates on "why." This is where we ask you to justify some design decisions, by explaining why the choices you made are better than alternatives. You may be able to state these in terms of time and space complexity, which can be made as rough or informal arguments (formal language or proofs are unnecessary).
An incomplete, evasive, or non-responsive design document or one that strays from the template without good reason may be penalized. Incorrect capitalization, punctuation, spelling, or grammar can also cost points. See section D. Project Documentation, for a sample design document for a fictitious project.
Your design will also be judged by looking at your source code. We will
typically look at the differences between the original Pintos source
tree and your submission, based on the output of a command like
diff -urpb pintos.orig pintos.submitted. We will try to match up your
description of the design with the code submitted. Important
discrepancies between the description and the actual code will be
penalized, as will be any bugs we find by spot checks.
The most important aspects of source code design are those that specifically relate to the operating system issues at stake in the project. For example, the organization of an inode is an important part of file system design, so in the file system project a poorly designed inode would lose points. Other issues are much less important. For example, multiple Pintos design problems call for a "priority queue," that is, a dynamic collection from which the minimum (or maximum) item can quickly be extracted. Fast priority queues can be implemented many ways, but we do not expect you to build a fancy data structure even if it might improve performance. Instead, you are welcome to use a linked list (and Pintos even provides one with convenient functions for sorting and finding minimums and maximums).
Pintos is written in a consistent style. Make your additions and modifications in existing Pintos source files blend in, not stick out. In new source files, adopt the existing Pintos style by preference, but make your code self-consistent at the very least. There should not be a patchwork of different styles that makes it obvious that three different people wrote the code. Use horizontal and vertical white space to make code readable. Add a brief comment on every structure, structure member, global or static variable, typedef, enumeration, and function definition. Update existing comments as you modify code. Don't comment out or use the preprocessor to ignore blocks of code (instead, remove it entirely). Use assertions to document key invariants. Decompose code into functions for clarity. Code that is difficult to understand because it violates these or other "common sense" software engineering practices will be penalized.
In the end, remember your audience. Code is written primarily to be read by humans. It has to be acceptable to the compiler too, but the compiler doesn't care about how it looks or how well it is written.
Pintos is distributed under a liberal license that allows free use, modification, and distribution. Students and others who work on Pintos own the code that they write and may use it for any purpose. Pintos comes with NO WARRANTY, not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See section License, for details of the license and lack of warranty.
Pintos and this documentation were written by Ben Pfaff email@example.com.
The GDB macros supplied with Pintos were written by Godmar Back firstname.lastname@example.org, and their documentation is adapted from his work.
The original structure and form of Pintos was inspired by the Nachos instructional operating system from the University of California, Berkeley ([ Christopher]).
A few of the Pintos source files are derived from code used in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's 6.828 advanced operating systems course. These files bear the original MIT license notice.
The Pintos projects and documentation originated with those designed for Nachos by current and former CS 140 teaching assistants at Stanford University, including at least Yu Ping, Greg Hutchins, Kelly Shaw, Paul Twohey, Sameer Qureshi, and John Rector.
Example code for monitors (see section A.3.4 Monitors) is from classroom slides originally by Dawson Engler and updated by Mendel Rosenblum.
Adjustments for Virginia Tech's CS 3204 were made by Godmar Back. Vijay Kumar wrote the section on how to set up CVS.
Pintos originated as a replacement for Nachos with a similar design. Since then Pintos has greatly diverged from the Nachos design. Pintos differs from Nachos in two important ways. First, Pintos runs on real or simulated 80x86 hardware, but Nachos runs as a process on a host operating system. Second, Pintos is written in C like most real-world operating systems, but Nachos is written in C++.
Why the name "Pintos"? First, like nachos, pinto beans are a common Mexican food. Second, Pintos is small and a "pint" is a small amount. Third, like drivers of the eponymous car, students are likely to have trouble with blow-ups.
|[ << ]||[ >> ]||[Top]||[Contents]||[Index]||[ ? ]|