|


Home
Syllabus
Calendar&
Class Notes
Projects
Homework
Grades
Participation
|
 |
CS/ISE 5714 - Usability Engineering - Spring 2008
Dr. Pardha S. Pyla

Homework #3 -- Usability Problem Analysis
This homework is to be done as an individual assignment only!
General instructions:
We have selected 10 critical incidents (or usability problems)
from the NY Ticket Kiosk that Dr. Hartson encountered during the in-class
usability testing demo originally recorded in the HCI lab in McBryde 102 and
played back in class (screen
video of Dr. Hartson serving as "expert" user participant, using
the NY Ticket Kiosk ). We used Morae in the lab to extract 10 video clips
(links to each are below) from the one large Morae video/audio we made during
that session.
For your class assignment, you are to diagnose each of these
usability problems by classifying it within the UAF (identifying the problem
type and subtypes and cause(s) within the interaction design), using the UAF
Viewer tool. We will send the URL for this Viewer in a listserv message to
the class. No username or password will be required to access the viewer;
just click on the Login button to get in. To review the critical incident
occurrence, task, and context, you can also use the
NY Kiosk site, the benchmark tasks (Benchmark Task #1, Benchmark Task #2), and the entire Morae video/audio
recording of the evaluation session (screen
video of Dr. Hartson serving as "expert" user participant, using
the NY Ticket Kiosk )
Deliverable:
A sheet, or sheets (stapled together), of paper with your name
and "Homework #3" at the top, printed from a Word (or similar) document.
For each problem:
-
Give the problem number from the list (no need to copy
the problem over) and write your chosen diagnosis path from the UAF, as
we did for the examples in class. You can be as terse as you like in writing
the path names, as long as we can understand them.
-
Write a brief rationale statement about why you picked the
category you did and not any other likely one.
- Declare whether you used the Wizard for help with this problem. (We will
give you information on how to access the Wizard.)
At the end, please indicate any feedback about the experience, including the
UAF, the UAF Viewer and the Wizard. We are especially interested in improving
the Wizard via your experience here.
Hints:
-
Treat each problem as a single, separate problem (not having
to extract multiple problems and not combining related problems this time).
- UP4 actually identifies two problems, but both have essentially the same
diagnosis, so treat them together as one.
- UP10 is not about the problem of which object to click on to select the
Three Tenors and the fact that the text looks like a link but isn't clickable.
This problem is about something that is true in this clip, but the participant
didn't comment on it explicitly. This is a critical incident noticed by the
evaluator independent of the participant's actions and comments. This is about
the fact that the little blue box you have to click on is very small and,
therefore, it is more difficult to click on it accurately.
-
While many diagnoses are obvious, there is not always necessarily
one "correct" answer. With this kind of diagnosis, "correctness"
is more a question of reliability, how similar are your results to those
of experienced usability engineering practitioners.
-
If you think it is a toss-up between two classification
categories and you definitely cannot decide between the two, give both
as your answer (will be considered your first and second choices in
order), showing them as separate answers. (Don't give more than two
possibilities, please.)
-
Grading will be based first on how well your classification
matches the expected norm (by experienced practitioners).
-
If your classification doesn't match, then we look at
your rationale and any second choices. If one of your choices is a good
match, you will get at least partial credit. If your choice is not a
match to the "norm" but your rationale is good, you can get
up to full credit.
-
Since the clips are from a real evaluation session, expect
realistic distribution of diagnoses across the Interaction Cycle.
-
IMPORTANT: If you have trouble making your diagnosis
at the top level, or you feel you're having to guess, or don't feel confident
about your top-level diagnosis choice (a common occurrence for beginners,
as you saw in class), try using the Wizard, which we will make available
to you.
The Morae Video/Audio Clips Defining the Usability Problems
Caution: These clips are in .wmv format. They may not work with Mac computers
and they might not play equally well with all media players (so we highly
recommend Camtasia Player, which will be made available to you).
Apologies for the fact that the header for each video says Video Clip #1.
UP1
UP2
UP3
UP4
UP5
UP6
UP7
UP8
UP9
UP10
|