CS 3724 - Human Computer Interaction - Summer 2004 -- Pardha S. Pyla

Presentation Evaluation Form

Team number: ____ Project Description:______________________________ Date:__________

Content (25 points) ________

Coverage – highlights of whole project?
Coverage – addressed assigned points?
Good description of process used, design evolution?
Clarity of development of points?
No jargon or unexplained acronyms?
Pitched well to audience?

Organization (25 points) ________

Well prepared, well organized?
Is level of treatment appropriate, not overly detailed nor too general?
Is presentation easy to follow, smooth continuity?
Structure – followed assigned structure, sequence?

Delivery (25 points) ________

Engaging presentation style, energetic, enthusiastic?
Smooth transition, if use more than one presenter?
Well practiced, rehearsed?
No reading from notes (just speak to points on overheads?
Speak slowly and clearly, with good volume and enunciation, no mumbling?
Did not go over time (or significantly under)?
Efficient, avoided stumbling, confusion, blank spots?

Format (15 points) ________

Good slide layout, uncluttered, slides not too busy?
Font size large enough to read? Font style legible? Font color good contrast with background?
Background uncluttered, not competing with content?
Visuals (e.g., key screen shots) used supportively?
Good use of graphics (e.g., well-labeled diagrams), if appropriate?
No misspellings, poor grammar, misuse of words?

Overall exceptional excellence (10 points) ________

These are discretionary points for us to reward the teams with the very best presentations, beyond fulfilling requirements. We will be conservative with these points, reserving them for the really outstanding presentations. It is not a negative reflection on your presentation if you don't get some or all of these points.

Total: ________

Comments: