Team number: ____ Project Description:______________________________ Date:__________

Content (25 points) ________

• Coverage – highlights of whole project?
• Coverage – addressed assigned points?
• Clarity of development of points?
• No jargon or unexplained acronyms?
• Pitched well to audience?

• Well prepared, well organized?
• Is level of treatment appropriate, not overly detailed nor too general?
• Is presentation easy to follow, smooth continuity?
• Structure – followed assigned structure, sequence?

• Engaging presentation style, energetic, enthusiastic?
• Smooth transition, if use more than one presenter?
• Well practiced, rehearsed?
• No reading from notes (just speak to points on overheads)?
• Clear, good volume and enunciation, no mumbling?
• Did not go over time (or significantly under)?
• Efficient, avoided stumbling, confusion, blank spots?

• Overheads not too busy, font large enough to read?
• Visuals (e.g., key screen shots) used supportively?
• Good use of graphics (e.g., diagrams), if appropriate?
• No misspellings, poor grammar, misuse of words?

• These are discretionary points for us to reward the teams with the very best presentations. We will be conservative with these points. It is not a negative reflection on your presentation if you don't get some or all of these points.

Comments: