INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION CRITERIA

The following measures were established as the criteria against which individual presentations would be judged in peer evaluations. Forms for evaluation will be distributed in class and should be graded A-F for each presenter; the forms will be collected at the end of the class and after a quick review will be returned to the presenter for their assistance. Cooperation in the evaluation process is part of the participation grade for the reviewer (as is the presentation for the speaker). No grade is associated with the evaluation of presenter - it is simply an advisory peer review for the presenter, and participation opportunity for the evaluators.


Evaluator's ID: ________ Speaker's Name ______________________
Evaluation Criteria
ContentGRADEPresentationGRADEGraphicsGRADE
Completeness
 
 Composure Visual Clarity 
Informative
 
 Clearness of Speech Context 
Organized
 
 Prepared Conciseness 
Interesting
 
 Well Paced Attractiveness 
Facts and Examples
 
 Integrated with Graphics Non-distracting* 
Clarity
 
 Well defined ending Relevance to Topic 

* Mrs. Birch pointed out that spelling mistakes are very distracting!

General Comments: _____________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________


Last updated 97/09/17
© J.A.N. Lee, 1996, 1997.