Peer Debate Presentation Evaluation Form
Dr. Hartson's CS3604

Your team # _________________

Evaluation of team # _____________________

Date of presentation _______________________

______ Content and Organization (33 points)

• equal time for each viewpoint
• good topic selection
• good structure
• good supporting evidence (e.g., reference to the ACM Code of Ethics)
• good thesis
• How well did the format follow the four roles as prescribed?  (e.g., scenario setup, pro, con, wrap-up)
• First and fourth speakers not biased

 ______ Presentation (the oral part) (33 points)

• speak slowly/clearly
• stay focused on topic
• well-practiced
• all members must participate
• attempt to be lively and engaging

______ Graphics (the visual part of presentations) (33 points)

• good layout
• relevant content
• well integrated
• no animation/sound
• well-labeled diagrams

______ NO NUDE MEN! (1 point)

______ TOTAL POINTS

Comments:

Your name ______________________________________________
(Necessary to give you credit for peer review.)