Instructor's Debate Presentation Evaluation
Form
Dr. Hartson's CS3604
Team # _________________ Topic ____________________________________________________________
Date of presentation _______________________
______ Content and Organization (30 points)
- equal
time for each viewpoint
- good
topic selection
- good
structure
- good
supporting evidence (e.g., reference to the ACM Code of Ethics)
- good
thesis
- How well did the format follow
the four roles as prescribed? (e.g., scenario setup, pro, con, wrap-up)
- First and fourth speakers not
biased
______ Presentation (the oral part) (30
points)
- speak
slowly/clearly
- stay
focused on topic
- well-practiced
- all
members must participate
- smooth transition from one
speaker to the next
- attempt
to be lively and engaging
- any interesting "props",
if appropriate
- includes Q&A and straw
poll at the end
______ Graphics (the visual part of presentations) (30 points)
- good
layout (e.g., not cluttered, busy)
- good, legible font size and
style and good color contrast with background
- background
uncluttered
- well
integrated
- well-labeled
diagrams
______ Discretionary (for overall quality) (10 points)