Re: Implicit Conversions


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CS2704 Web Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Amit Nithian on May 04, 2001 at 00:20:00:

In Reply to: Implicit Conversions posted by Michael Young on May 03, 2001 at 23:26:51:

: From the notes and class lectures, I know that if there is a constructor that takes one parameter, then that is used to convert from that type.

: So, if class Rational contained:

: Rational(int Top, int Bottom=1);
: Rational operator+(const Rational& RHS);

: Then you could write:

: Rational A, B(1);
: A=B+3;

: and it would compile. 3 would be coverted to a Rational and added to B. However, what if you were to write:

: A=3+B;

: Would the compiler know to convert 3 to a Rational? If not, how can we make it, aside from explicitly saying it? 'cause, it seems natural to write it that way.

: TIA!
: Michael Young


It would seem to me that there would have to be a + operator defined that takes a left hand parameter of integer. It is possible that there is some default constructor (with default arguments) that handles this, which to me throws things off.

- Amit Nithian



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CS2704 Web Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]