Posted by Andy on December 03, 2001 at 21:19:40:
In Reply to: Re: Required classes... posted by Jo on December 03, 2001 at 21:06:55:
Not to mention the ever ambigious "Missing Relationship" or "Missing Multiplicity" deductions. No details there, just -6, -6 bam!
: This is pretty unbelievable! i lost 30 marks for not having some classes which were not required explicitly as per the specs.
: nothing but unfair...any chance of a re-evaluation? this will make our grades tumble like crazy!
: : : You're correct...I didn't see any detailed outline of required classes for us to represent in our design. I thought the design of the program was up to us and that we should come up with our own way of representing the program spec. I think it'd be hard for us to read our professor's minds and know what exact classes they wanted us to represent. I received a low grade because I didn't represent the classes they wanted me to. I'm sorry I can't read minds. Otherwise I would have done just fine.
Post a Followup