Index:
This paper discusses the security considerations for remote electronic voting in public elections. In particular, we examine the feasibility of running national federal elections over the Internet. The focus of this paper is on the limitations of the current deployed infrastructure in terms of the security of the hosts and the Internet itself. We conclude that at present, our infrastructure is inadequate for remote Internet voting.
Should an anonymous e-mail'er be revealed to the recipient by the ISP?
On July 11, 2000, the existence of an FBI Internet monitoring system called "Carnivore" was widely reported. Although the public details were sketchy, reports indicated that the Carnivore system is installed at the facilities of an Internet Service Provider (ISP) and can monitor all traffic moving through that ISP. The FBI claims that Carnivore "filters" data traffic and delivers to investigators only those "packets" that they are lawfully authorized to obtain. Because the details remain secret, the public is left to trust the FBI's characterization of the system and -- more significantly -- the FBI's compliance with legal requirements.
As Web developer for various businesses, Jeff Burson, of Birmingham, Alabama, felt a need for heightened e-mail security when exchanging professional correspondence with his partner or with clients. "Sometimes we exchange [critical] ideas for a client, and we need to make sure that nothing sensitive gets out," he says.
See also the "paper" bibliography and in 1993, Ronald E. Anderson, Deborah G. Johnson, Donald Gotterbarn and Judith Perrolle published an article "Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making" (Commmunications of the ACM, February, 1993) that contained a useful set of references.